RE: [Springframework-developer] Example classes needed

[<tri...@tr...>]

1b and 2c ('spring.jar' and 'spring-beans.jar') +1

Once we decide on a naming structure - I will need a some time to modify the
MVC-step-by-step documents that are part of the release.  So let's finalize this
today if we can :-)

Thomas


> Lars,
> 
> The problem is that we have multiple jar files:
> - spring-beans.jar
> - spring-aop.jar
> - spring-jdbc.jar
> - spring-orm.jar
> - spring-context.jar
> - spring-full.jar
> 
> "full" indicates that it includes all of Spring. We could name it
> "spring.jar" of course, I'm quite inclined towards this if others agree. What
> does everybody think?
> 
> Regarding Colin's argument on in-between numbering: I wouldn't mind dropping
> the version number altogether, in Hibernate/Ant/Servlet style. I'm just not a
> fan of very specific file names.
> 
> So 2 questions:
> 1. a) "spring-full.jar" or b) "spring.jar" for the complete jar file
> 2. a) "spring-beans-1.0m1.jar", b) "spring-beans-1.0.jar" or c)
> "spring-beans.jar"
> 
> In the meantime, I tend to vote 1b and 2c. I wouldn't mind 1a or 2b either,
> though.
> 
> Juergen
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Fischer [mailto:lar...@gm...]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 5:56 PM
> To: jürgen höller [werk3AT]
> Cc: spr...@li...; tri...@tr...;
> rod...@in...
> Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Example classes needed
> 
> 
> What about spring.jar, spring2.jar ? I don't like this "-full".
> 
> 
> > Hmmm, not much response yet... I still tend to prefer "sp
> > ring-full-1.0.jar", for easy drop-in. IMO, a jar file doe
> > s not need to reflect the exact detail version. I conside
> > r it fine enough if it indicates the major version. See s
> > ervlet.jar, hibernate2.jar. Can we please decide on this 
> > until *tomorrow*? :-)
> >  
> > Juergen
> >  
> >  
> > 
> > -----Original 
> > Message-----
> > From: jürgen höller [werk3AT] 
> > Sent: Mon
> > day, August 25, 2003 11:50 PM
> > To: Lars Fischer; springfr
> > ame...@li...
> > Cc: trisberg@tri
> > db.com
> > Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Example 
> > classes needed
> > 
> > 
> > Let's vote on this. I don't mind eith
> > er naming strategy for jar files. Anybody else prefering 
> > the spring-full-1.0m1 style?
> >  
> > BTW, Hibernate uses hibe
> > rnate2.jar for its whole 2.x tree. Log4J uses log4j-1.2.8
> > .jar for the specific version. 2 examples for opposite en
> > ds, I guess.
> >  
> > Juergen
> >  
> >  
> > 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nac
> > hricht----- 
> > Von: Lars Fischer [mailto:lars.fischer@gmxp
> > ro.net] 
> > Gesendet: Mo 25.08.2003 23:18 
> > An: springframe
> > wor...@li... 
> > Cc: jürgen hölle
> > r [werk3AT]; tri...@tr... 
> > Betreff: Re: [Springfra
> > mework-developer] Example classes needed
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I agree w
> > ith Thomas, I once made a mistake because I didn't realiz
> > e
> > that I was using an older version. The jar-files shoul
> > d be named after
> > the version.
> > 
> > > Juergen,
> > >
> > > The dr
> > awback then is that you can't tell from the jar file if i
> > t is M1, M2
> > > or
> > > the release jar.
> > >
> > > Thomas
> > >
> > > 
> > > It's gonna be "spring-framework-1.0m1" and "spring-full
> > -1.0.jar", if we
> > > stick
> > > > to the current plan. We've
> >  used the same naming strategy for 0.9.x, e.g.
> > > > "spri
> > ng-framework-0.9.1" but still "spring-full-0.9.jar". I pr
> > efer that
> > > way
> > > > to ease drop-in replacement in the 
> > literal sense :-) The build
> > > properties
> > > > reflect th
> > is in "spring-version=1.0" and "spring-version-detail=1.0
> > m1".
> > > > 
> > > > Juergen
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >
> > > >     -----Ur
> > sprÃf¼ngliche Nachricht-----
> > > >     Von: trisberg@trid
> > b.com [ mailto:tri...@tr...]
> > > >     Gesendet: Mo 
> > 25.08.2003 19:21
> > > >     An: jÃf¼rgen hÃf¶ller [werk3A
> > T]
> > > >     Cc: Lars Fischer; springframework-developer@l
> > ists.sourceforge.net
> > > >     Betreff: RE: [Springframewo
> > rk-developer] Example classes needed
> > > >    
> > > >    
> > >
> >  >
> > > >     Juergen,
> > > >    
> > > >     > Anyway, ContextL
> > oaderServlet *will* be in 1.0 M1, to be released at
> > > th
> > e
> > > > end
> > > >     > of this week if there aren't any ma
> > jor obstacles. BTW, can everybody
> > > > please
> > > >     > 
> > test the current CVS contents against own applications?
> > > >     >
> > > >    
> > > >     I am updating the Step-by-ste
> > p-MVC document - what will the exact name
> > > of
> > > > the
> > 
> > > >     directory and the jar file be?  I'm assuming 'sp
> > ring-framework-1.0M1'
> > > and
> > > >     'spring-full-1.0M1.
> > jar'.
> > > >    
> > > >     Thomas
> > > >    
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>