|
From: Lars F. <lar...@gm...> - 2003-08-28 15:56:24
|
What about spring.jar, spring2.jar ? I don't like this "-full". > Hmmm, not much response yet... I still tend to prefer "sp > ring-full-1.0.jar", for easy drop-in. IMO, a jar file doe > s not need to reflect the exact detail version. I conside > r it fine enough if it indicates the major version. See s > ervlet.jar, hibernate2.jar. Can we please decide on this > until *tomorrow*? :-) > > Juergen > > > > -----Original > Message----- > From: jürgen höller [werk3AT] > Sent: Mon > day, August 25, 2003 11:50 PM > To: Lars Fischer; springfr > ame...@li... > Cc: trisberg@tri > db.com > Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Example > classes needed > > > Let's vote on this. I don't mind eith > er naming strategy for jar files. Anybody else prefering > the spring-full-1.0m1 style? > > BTW, Hibernate uses hibe > rnate2.jar for its whole 2.x tree. Log4J uses log4j-1.2.8 > .jar for the specific version. 2 examples for opposite en > ds, I guess. > > Juergen > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nac > hricht----- > Von: Lars Fischer [mailto:lars.fischer@gmxp > ro.net] > Gesendet: Mo 25.08.2003 23:18 > An: springframe > wor...@li... > Cc: jürgen hölle > r [werk3AT]; tri...@tr... > Betreff: Re: [Springfra > mework-developer] Example classes needed > > > > I agree w > ith Thomas, I once made a mistake because I didn't realiz > e > that I was using an older version. The jar-files shoul > d be named after > the version. > > > Juergen, > > > > The dr > awback then is that you can't tell from the jar file if i > t is M1, M2 > > or > > the release jar. > > > > Thomas > > > > > > It's gonna be "spring-framework-1.0m1" and "spring-full > -1.0.jar", if we > > stick > > > to the current plan. We've > used the same naming strategy for 0.9.x, e.g. > > > "spri > ng-framework-0.9.1" but still "spring-full-0.9.jar". I pr > efer that > > way > > > to ease drop-in replacement in the > literal sense :-) The build > > properties > > > reflect th > is in "spring-version=1.0" and "spring-version-detail=1.0 > m1". > > > > > > Juergen > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Ur > sprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > Von: trisberg@trid > b.com [ mailto:tri...@tr...] > > > Gesendet: Mo > 25.08.2003 19:21 > > > An: jürgen höller [werk3A > T] > > > Cc: Lars Fischer; springframework-developer@l > ists.sourceforge.net > > > Betreff: RE: [Springframewo > rk-developer] Example classes needed > > > > > > > > > > > > > Juergen, > > > > > > > Anyway, ContextL > oaderServlet *will* be in 1.0 M1, to be released at > > th > e > > > end > > > > of this week if there aren't any ma > jor obstacles. BTW, can everybody > > > please > > > > > test the current CVS contents against own applications? > > > > > > > > > > I am updating the Step-by-ste > p-MVC document - what will the exact name > > of > > > the > > > > directory and the jar file be? I'm assuming 'sp > ring-framework-1.0M1' > > and > > > 'spring-full-1.0M1. > jar'. > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |