RE: [Springframework-developer] Example classes needed

[Alef A. \(JTeam\) <al...@jt...>]

+1 for spring-full-1.0.jar=20
=20

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: spr...@li...
[mailto:spr...@li...] Namens
Kopylenko, Dmitry
Verzonden: Thursday, August 28, 2003 2:56 PM
Aan: 'j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]';
'spr...@li...'
CC: 'tri...@tr...'; 'rod...@in...'
Onderwerp: RE: [Springframework-developer] Example classes needed


+1 for spring-full-1.0.jar

-----Original Message-----
From: j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] [mailto:jue...@we...]=20
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 8:53 AM
To: spr...@li...
Cc: tri...@tr...; rod...@in...
Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Example classes needed


Hmmm, not much response yet... I still tend to prefer
"spring-full-1.0.jar", for easy drop-in. IMO, a jar file does not need
to reflect the exact detail version. I consider it fine enough if it
indicates the major version. See servlet.jar, hibernate2.jar. Can we
please decide on this until *tomorrow*? :-)
=20
Juergen
=20
=20

-----Original Message-----
From: j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]=20
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 11:50 PM
To: Lars Fischer; spr...@li...
Cc: tri...@tr...
Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Example classes needed


Let's vote on this. I don't mind either naming strategy for jar files.
Anybody else prefering the spring-full-1.0m1 style?
=20
BTW, Hibernate uses hibernate2.jar for its whole 2.x tree. Log4J uses
log4j-1.2.8.jar for the specific version. 2 examples for opposite ends,
I guess.
=20
Juergen
=20
=20

-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----=20
Von: Lars Fischer [mailto:lar...@gm...]=20
Gesendet: Mo 25.08.2003 23:18=20
An: spr...@li...=20
Cc: j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]; tri...@tr...=20
Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Example classes needed



I agree with Thomas, I once made a mistake because I didn't realize
that I was using an older version. The jar-files should be named after
the version.

> Juergen,
>
> The drawback then is that you can't tell from the jar file if it is
M1, M2
> or
> the release jar.
>
> Thomas
>
> > It's gonna be "spring-framework-1.0m1" and "spring-full-1.0.jar", if
we
> stick
> > to the current plan. We've used the same naming strategy for 0.9.x,
e.g.
> > "spring-framework-0.9.1" but still "spring-full-0.9.jar". I prefer
that
> way
> > to ease drop-in replacement in the literal sense :-) The build
> properties
> > reflect this in "spring-version=3D1.0" and
"spring-version-detail=3D1.0m1".
> >=20
> > Juergen
> >=20
> >=20
> >
> >     -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Nachricht-----
> >     Von: tri...@tr... [mailto:tri...@tr...]
> >     Gesendet: Mo 25.08.2003 19:21
> >     An: j=C3=BCrgen h=C3=B6ller [werk3AT]
> >     Cc: Lars Fischer;
spr...@li...
> >     Betreff: RE: [Springframework-developer] Example classes needed
> >   =20
> >   =20
> >
> >     Juergen,
> >   =20
> >     > Anyway, ContextLoaderServlet *will* be in 1.0 M1, to be
released at
> the
> > end
> >     > of this week if there aren't any major obstacles. BTW, can
everybody
> > please
> >     > test the current CVS contents against own applications?
> >     >
> >   =20
> >     I am updating the Step-by-step-MVC document - what will the
exact name
> of
> > the
> >     directory and the jar file be?  I'm assuming
'spring-framework-1.0M1'
> and
> >     'spring-full-1.0M1.jar'.
> >   =20
> >     Thomas
> >   =20
> >
> >
>
>
>