Re: [Springframework-developer] Example classes needed

[Colin S. <col...@ex...>]

To throw some water into the fire, :-), I prefer the exact name when 
using Maven, since I can enforce what I am getting, but when managing 
dependencies manually, I prefer not to have a version in the name except 
when it is something like a major version number which indicates a 
different api; then I can slip a new version in as needed without 
changing all references.

jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote:

> Hmmm, not much response yet... I still tend to prefer 
> "spring-full-1.0.jar", for easy drop-in. IMO, a jar file does not need 
> to reflect the exact detail version. I consider it fine enough if it 
> indicates the major version. See servlet.jar, hibernate2.jar. Can we 
> please decide on this until *tomorrow*? :-)
>  
> Juergen
>  
>  
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     *From:* jürgen höller [werk3AT]
>     *Sent:* Monday, August 25, 2003 11:50 PM
>     *To:* Lars Fischer; spr...@li...
>     *Cc:* tri...@tr...
>     *Subject:* Re: [Springframework-developer] Example classes needed
>
>     Let's vote on this. I don't mind either naming strategy for jar
>     files. Anybody else prefering the spring-full-1.0m1 style?
>      
>     BTW, Hibernate uses hibernate2.jar for its whole 2.x tree. Log4J
>     uses log4j-1.2.8.jar for the specific version. 2 examples for
>     opposite ends, I guess.
>      
>     Juergen
>      
>      
>
>         -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>         *Von:* Lars Fischer [mailto:lar...@gm...]
>         *Gesendet:* Mo 25.08.2003 23:18
>         *An:* spr...@li...
>         *Cc:* jürgen höller [werk3AT]; tri...@tr...
>         *Betreff:* Re: [Springframework-developer] Example classes needed
>
>         I agree with Thomas, I once made a mistake because I didn't
>         realize
>         that I was using an older version. The jar-files should be
>         named after
>         the version.
>
>         > Juergen,
>         >
>         > The drawback then is that you can't tell from the jar file
>         if it is M1, M2
>         > or
>         > the release jar.
>         >
>         > Thomas
>         >
>         > > It's gonna be "spring-framework-1.0m1" and
>         "spring-full-1.0.jar", if we
>         > stick
>         > > to the current plan. We've used the same naming strategy
>         for 0.9.x, e.g.
>         > > "spring-framework-0.9.1" but still "spring-full-0.9.jar".
>         I prefer that
>         > way
>         > > to ease drop-in replacement in the literal sense :-) The build
>         > properties
>         > > reflect this in "spring-version=1.0" and
>         "spring-version-detail=1.0m1".
>         > > 
>         > > Juergen
>         > > 
>         > > 
>         > >
>         > >     -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>         > >     Von: tri...@tr... [mailto:tri...@tr...]
>         > >     Gesendet: Mo 25.08.2003 19:21
>         > >     An: jürgen höller [werk3AT]
>         > >     Cc: Lars Fischer;
>         spr...@li...
>         > >     Betreff: RE: [Springframework-developer] Example
>         classes needed
>         > >    
>         > >    
>         > >
>         > >     Juergen,
>         > >    
>         > >     > Anyway, ContextLoaderServlet *will* be in 1.0 M1, to
>         be released at
>         > the
>         > > end
>         > >     > of this week if there aren't any major obstacles.
>         BTW, can everybody
>         > > please
>         > >     > test the current CVS contents against own applications?
>         > >     >
>         > >    
>         > >     I am updating the Step-by-step-MVC document - what
>         will the exact name
>         > of
>         > > the
>         > >     directory and the jar file be?  I'm assuming
>         'spring-framework-1.0M1'
>         > and
>         > >     'spring-full-1.0M1.jar'.
>         > >    
>         > >     Thomas
>         > >    
>         > >
>         > >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>