|
From: Lars F. <lar...@gm...> - 2003-08-25 21:18:48
|
I agree with Thomas, I once made a mistake because I didn't realize that I was using an older version. The jar-files should be named after the version. > Juergen, > > The drawback then is that you can't tell from the jar file if it is M1, M2 > or > the release jar. > > Thomas > > > It's gonna be "spring-framework-1.0m1" and "spring-full-1.0.jar", if we > stick > > to the current plan. We've used the same naming strategy for 0.9.x, e.g. > > "spring-framework-0.9.1" but still "spring-full-0.9.jar". I prefer that > way > > to ease drop-in replacement in the literal sense :-) The build > properties > > reflect this in "spring-version=1.0" and "spring-version-detail=1.0m1". > > > > Juergen > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: tri...@tr... [mailto:tri...@tr...] > > Gesendet: Mo 25.08.2003 19:21 > > An: jürgen höller [werk3AT] > > Cc: Lars Fischer; spr...@li... > > Betreff: RE: [Springframework-developer] Example classes needed > > > > > > > > Juergen, > > > > > Anyway, ContextLoaderServlet *will* be in 1.0 M1, to be released at > the > > end > > > of this week if there aren't any major obstacles. BTW, can everybody > > please > > > test the current CVS contents against own applications? > > > > > > > I am updating the Step-by-step-MVC document - what will the exact name > of > > the > > directory and the jar file be? I'm assuming 'spring-framework-1.0M1' > and > > 'spring-full-1.0M1.jar'. > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > |