|
From: <tri...@tr...> - 2003-08-25 20:53:46
|
Juergen, The drawback then is that you can't tell from the jar file if it is M1, M2 or the release jar. Thomas > It's gonna be "spring-framework-1.0m1" and "spring-full-1.0.jar", if we stick > to the current plan. We've used the same naming strategy for 0.9.x, e.g. > "spring-framework-0.9.1" but still "spring-full-0.9.jar". I prefer that way > to ease drop-in replacement in the literal sense :-) The build properties > reflect this in "spring-version=1.0" and "spring-version-detail=1.0m1". > > Juergen > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: tri...@tr... [mailto:tri...@tr...] > Gesendet: Mo 25.08.2003 19:21 > An: jürgen höller [werk3AT] > Cc: Lars Fischer; spr...@li... > Betreff: RE: [Springframework-developer] Example classes needed > > > > Juergen, > > > Anyway, ContextLoaderServlet *will* be in 1.0 M1, to be released at the > end > > of this week if there aren't any major obstacles. BTW, can everybody > please > > test the current CVS contents against own applications? > > > > I am updating the Step-by-step-MVC document - what will the exact name of > the > directory and the jar file be? I'm assuming 'spring-framework-1.0M1' and > 'spring-full-1.0M1.jar'. > > Thomas > > > |