|
From: JP P. <jp....@ti...> - 2003-08-20 19:38:55
|
>> P.s. any comments on code, tests or whatever are appreciated... Alef, In the time I used Struts I was a Tiles fan. It's a good thing to enable its use in Spring, but I consider it not so dramatically useful as in Struts. The Spring views definition allows a behaviour close to Tiles although not completely so rich and with one indirection level less. I am just a little frustrated since individual "attributesCSV" properties cannot longer be redefined in "child" views. This was possible until a month ago. With this feature we were very close to Tiles. Take a look at the "Countries" demo. You will see a construction letting see a "Tiles like" approach. In summary, my thought is: - For small and middle layout complexity, the original possibilities of Spring are largely sufficient. - For complex layouts and large applications, Tiles adds managing possibilities. - The value of Tiles is not as great as in Struts, due to the better views handling. But don't think it's no worth ;-). Finally, adding Tiles improves the Spring scalability. Regards, Jean-Pierre |