Re: [Springframework-developer] Re: Package switch

[<rod...@in...>]

>Actually, I'd very much prefer if you'd take the snapshot 
tonight. I have touched quite some files, so I'm not keen on 
merging these into 2 source trees. What about taking the 
snapshot tomorrow morning and create the new module 
*tomorrow*? 

OK. I've successfully tried the scripts I used so it should 
be easy enough to run again tomorrow.



- "spring10" forces us to put Spring 1.1, 1.2, etc *each* in 
a new module: too fine-granular IMO, branches are a way 
better choice for such point releases. 

- "spring1" just forces us to put Spring 2.0 into a new 
module: much better IMO, using branches within the module for 
1.1, 1.2, etc. 

- "spring" would allow to use to stay with the module as long 
as we want (including 2.0 or longer), as it would still allow 
for a later "spring2" or "spring3" name if ever necessary: 
admittedly debatable, but the way that Hibernate chose 
("hibernate", then "hibernate2"). 


I think spring1 is probably best. But spring would be fine 
also. Votes?

Regards,
Rod