Re: [Springframework-developer] Current release plan - why delay package renaming?

[<tri...@tr...>]

Juergen & Everybody,

> So, opinion poll: stay with 0.9.1
> or eagerly move to 1.0 beta1 now? I'm inclined to go for the latter.
> 

I could go either way - beta1 kind of implies a feature freeze, but we are 
still adding a few features, so I would probably go 0.9.1.
 
> BTW, what does everybody think regarding a new CVS module "main1"/"main10",
> or "spring1"/"spring10", or the like? The Hibernate team works with a
> "hibernate2" module currently, having the 1.0 tree in "hibernate", so
> creating a new module seems appropriate to me.

I'd say "spring1"

>  
> To avoid unnecessary further delays, I urge everybody to commit all dangling
> changes. If we agree on the module and its name, I'd like to create it on
> Monday and import a clean org.springframework version. Then we should test
> that with current apps, and if everything succeeds, we should be able to
> publish the release at the end of the week.
>

Once you change the package name, I'll make sure the 'Step-by-step-MVC' guide 
is up to date.

  
Thomas