|
From: Kopylenko, D. <dko...@ac...> - 2003-08-01 17:17:47
|
+1 for switching now -----Original Message----- From: rod...@in... [mailto:rod...@in...]=20 Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:55 AM To: Colin Sampaleanu Cc: j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]; spr...@li...; = rod...@in... Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Current release plan - why = delay package renaming? >I wanted to play the devil's advocate and suggest that the package=20 renaming be done now instead of later. I understand that the=20 main issue=20 is that it takes a while to do it through SourceForge in=20 terms of=20 hanlding the CVS dirs on the server itself. However, the=20 possibility of=20 just doing a checkin to the new location has already been=20 mentioned and=20 would be very easy. Of course the history for files would=20 still be=20 available at the old location.=20 I think this deserves serious consideration, although we=20 previously agreed the RC1 timeframe. Let's vote on it. I vote=20 for switching now, although I'm open to good counter- arguments. Another advantage of the new location approach is that we=20 don't need to delay things by waiting for SourceForge to do=20 anything. Regards, Rod ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including = Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download = today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01= /01 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |