|
From: Trevor C. <pr...@se...> - 2003-08-01 14:07:48
|
>>FYI, I'll be travelling to Australia for the whole of September, >>so I'd prefer to get 0.9.2 out before that, and our first = org.springframework >>1.0 RC right after my return. Is a 1.0 RC1 target at the beginning of=20 >>October fine for everybody? I hope it's not too late, but we will need = >>the time anyway for documentation and all that stuff. 1.0 final could >>be possible in November then. Timing sounds good. I'm in the same boat right now with summer vacation = - work 1 day, take 3 off :) (that's why you'll notice so many emails = from me today, and nothing till next week :) ). I won't be back to = regular hours (work and presonally) until mid-September. It would be = nice to get stuff out quicker, but I think your estimates/targets are = bang on considering "reality". >>BTW, we don't *need* to make SourceForge change our CVS directories=20 >>to apply the package name change. We could also keep the current=20 >>"main" module as it is, including all its version history, and=20 >>introduce a new "main10" module with a fresh import of an = org.springframework=20 >>version. This would also make sense in terms of dead directories that=20 >>a CVS update always traverses: There wouldn't be any then. I'm not that familiar with modules, but I think the main thing is making = sure it's easy to fetch the single current version. If your method will = do that, no problem here. Trevor D. Cook |