|
From: <tri...@tr...> - 2003-07-30 21:08:19
|
Trevor & All, > 1. What still needs to be done for 0.9.1. From that list, what is currently > "assigned" to someone and what still needs help? I have nothing additional. > 2. Same as #1 but for the 1.0 release. I'll be adding functionality to the JDBC package. Returning resultset from a stored procedure is the main addition. This should all be additional functionality and not break the existing API. > 3. What is the target time-frame for the 0.9.1 and 1.0 releases (obviously > this is sketchy since it's "volunteer" work, but "gut guesses" - probably > from Juergen :) - based on work left is what I'm hoping for. The previous > estimate was the 1.0RC1 by now. Once 0.9.1 is out (any day now AFAIK), I would suggest a 4-6 weeks "beta" testing period. I'm hoping to use parts of the framework in new projects the next couple of months. Tha would put the 1.0 release somewhere in September. > > To expand on my fourth question with a recommendation (hopefully it makes > sense to everyone). If possible we should finalize the public api for > version 0.9.1 rather than at the 1.0RC1. This will allow usage in new > development without fear of incompatibilities in the next couple months. 100% agreement - I'm pretty much in the same boat. If we keep the API stable I can start using it on new development. Thomas |