Re: [Springframework-developer] Any particular reason versions of mockobjects and easymock are so old?

[Rod J. <rod...@in...>]

> I noticed spring is still using mockmaker 0.7 as opposed to the current
> 0.9, which has the really nice Dynamock functionality...
>
> Also, there is a much newer easymock implementation, 1.0RC.
>
> I presume this is know, and there's maybe an issue with the time
> required to convert existing code?

We're using EasyMock instead of Dynamock for dynamic mock objects. I've
looked at dynamock and am not convinced it's better than EasyMock, although
we may consider migrating in the future.

Yes, we need to migrate versions of both Mock Objects and EasyMock, but it's
doing what we need so it's a relatively low priority. Of course if you
wanted to help, that would be most welcome!

Regards,
Rod