Re: [Springframework-developer] Fw: [springframework - Open Discussion] RE: BeanFactory=>Generic Container

[Rod J. <rod...@in...>]

I think there's merit in this idea. As it happens, it's something I've
thought of a few times myself, but never seen that much advantage in. On
reflection I guess eliminating yet another container dependency is a good
thing.

How would you propose implementing it? An additional "special" attribute
like class or parent? With a default of init() or something?

The signature would need to be able to throw any exception.

On balance, I think this is a good idea and am in favour of it.

Regards,
Rod

----- Original Message -----
From: "jürgen höller [werk3AT]" <jue...@we...>
To: <spr...@li...>
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:54 AM
Subject: [Springframework-developer] Fw: [springframework - Open Discussion]
RE: BeanFactory=>Generic Container


> Rod, everyone,
>
> I consider that an interesting idea: As an alternative to
InitializingBean, we could indeed add such an "initializing_method"
attribute, specifying a no-arg init method on the object. That would allow
for initialization that depends on multiple properties without implementing
any Spring-specific interface. What you think about this?
>
> Juergen
>
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: SourceForge.net [mailto:no...@so...]
> Gesendet: Fr 18.07.2003 01:41
> An: no...@so...
> Cc:
> Betreff: [springframework - Open Discussion] RE: BeanFactory=>Generic
Container
>
>
>
>
> Read and respond to this message at:
> https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2109437
> By: skroah
>
> Ok, i'll buy not changing the xml binding stuff. How come an an optional
<bean>
> attribute called initializing_method was not added? The bean factory can
then
> invoke some named no arg init method on the object.
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum.
> To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit:
> https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=250339
>
>
> NHu1yjjzX9L2v zjrzjrz r} ~{zz劭u–~zqz~{z