|
From: <pr...@se...> - 2003-07-11 16:13:51
|
I think this is a great idea but what is the criteria for who can go on the page (what "qualifies" them as a "spring company"). This could be either developers who use Spring or websites that feature Spring. It also should specify whether they get added if they are currently using Spring in development, or if they have a released project/website utilizing Spring (in some stage - alpha, beta - charlie :) - production). I think that since Spring is much more than a webapp we should include everyone who uses Spring, but because Spring will probably get the majority of press (at least initially) as a competing web framework (compared to Struts or WebWorks for example) that we should highlight websites powered by Spring. I would personally suggest 2 sections for the page. First a "Used by" section for develeopers/companies using Spring in their products (whether webapp, client apps, etc.). This would mainly contain software/consulting companies and large companies (insurance/banks/universities) who use it in-house. I would then create a second section called "Powered by" for websites based on Spring. The two labels (used/powered) can be changed to whatever everyone thinks, but I'm just presenting the concept. While some companies may be listed in both sections, I think the benefit is that we highlight the power of Spring as a general framework AND as a web framework. I would also vote that they should have at least a beta product or deployed website, otherwise we'll get everyone and their brother on the list. We'll have to trust "internal" companies which don't release products publically, but these are simply guidelines people will read when asking (or being solicited) to be on the list (not a gestapo-like attack squad to hunt down the "unworthy" :) ). The second issue is what info we should include. We could have name, logo, location (at various levels from country to actual address), website, company blurb (who they are - although these could get long and annoying), spring blurb (why/how they use it), industry, and probably others I'm not thinking of. My vote would be for: Company Name, hyperlinked logo to website (if no logo use text), country, and industry (although I would recommend we create a fairly general industry with things like "software" and "education" or it will get way too specific like "Distributed CRM Software Consulting"). Anyway, that's my 2 cents. Also, I have permission from my boss and the current/future companies to place them on this list. Once we formalize the list criteria and info we want I'll fire it off. We should also specify where to send this info for the list (do we post it to sourceforge or is there a specific email address this stuff should go to). Other ideas/comments? Trevor D. Cook -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of Rod Johnson Sent: July 10, 2003 1:10 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: [Springframework-developer] Who's using Spring That thought about JDBC usage reminds me: it would be great if we could have a list, or logos, of companies and organizations using Spring. Can we build a list and check permission as necessary? Some starting thoughts... Rutgers University Werk3AT clients? fotosource I can check with a couple of companies in the UK as to whether they'd be happy to be listed. Regards, Rod |