RE: [Springframework-developer] Questions and additions

[Alef A. <al...@jt...>]

>Yes, this sounds interesting. Because it's so easy to 
implement views with Spring we probably need to think about 
how to organize things. Or maybe just in the main source tree 
and wear the dependencies?

I would keep them separate (I even don't like it that I had to get into
the Struts sourcecode to find out things, when half a year ago, Tiles
just used to be separate package, that delivered its own plugin for
Struts). If there's Velocity resolver later on and a WebMacro resolver
and things like that, you'll end up with tens of megabytes of jars...
Also, when there's a standard structure for 'addons', it's easier to
document them I think, and people can just pick what they like... Well,
whatever, let's just first finish it ;-).

I've been testing all over with the TilesResolver thingy, and it's
working quite well. I want to test it a little more to see if every
feature Tiles has works and then - after some more readable
documentation - I'll send it...

Cheers,

Alef