Re: [Springframework-developer] Package names

[<tri...@tr...>]

Rod, Juergen, All:

> Personally, I'm inclined to a package change even at this time, before our
> first public release. Well, we've been talking about a release _tomorrow_,
> but I wouldn't mind delaying it till next week to be able to incorporate the
> package name change - if the whole group decides to apply it.

Unless we can make the change this week, I think we should release 0.9 as is and
then follow up with a 0.91 or 0.95 release that includes the package name change.

Even Sun switched java package names around when they developed Swing, and they
pulled it off.

I don't like long package names, so I have also reserverd 'org.springfw' just to
give us another option.

(1) package com.interface21.jdbc.core.support;
(2) package org.springframework.jdbc.core.support;
(3) package org.springfw.jdbc.core.support;

I like #3

Thomas