|
From: Ken K. <kk...@kk...> - 2003-06-23 18:22:12
|
I will make these changes. Ken Rod Johnson wrote: >>Regarding the implementation: I've noticed that the Clinic interface >> >> >duplicates ClinicDAO's methods to a large extent, and that ClinicImpl adds >cross-referencing and caching to the entities (data access aspects). This >isn't really proper separation between data access code and business logic, >but of course the borders are often somewhat blurring. In our case, it's >probably more appropriate to merge the two, i.e. offer just a Clinic >interface, with the common logic in an AbstractClinic base class, and a >ClinicJdbcImpl default implementation. > >I agree with this. As Juergen says, it's most important to separate web and >business code. > >Thanks very much for all you hard work on this, Ken. I'm unlikely to get a >chance to look at the code in detail before Boston, but the first version >was looking good and I'm sure you've continued to improve it substantially! > >Regards, >Rod > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU >Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. >Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! >INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php >_______________________________________________ >Springframework-developer mailing list >Spr...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > > |