Re: [Springframework-developer] Re: JDO interceptor

[<rod...@in...>]

<juergen>
Finally, regarding package structure: I suggest to move 
specific AOP interceptor implementations to the 
respective "functionality domain" packages, i.e.: 
- the EJB interceptors to com.interface21.ejb.access; 
- the transaction interceptor to 
com.interface21.transaction.aop; 
- the Hibernate/JDO interceptors to 
com.interface21.orm.hibernate/jdo 

This would allow us to keep the package dependencies clear, 
especially at the com.interface21 level. I consider 
com.interface21.aop a basic package that should just provide 
the AOP support infrastructure. Higher-level ones like 
com.interface21.orm should depend on aop but not vice versa, 
IMO. This way, classes related to a certain functionality 
domain or third-party tool can stay in one well-defined 
package (or package tree), instead of being spread across the 
project. 
</juergen>

I've wondered about that myself. I'm happy with the proposed 
refactoring. It makes sense as now DataSourceUtils etc. 
depend on AOP.

Regards,
Rod