|
From: <tri...@tr...> - 2003-05-30 01:29:51
|
Rod, I vote for breaking backward compatibility now, before the first release. As soon as you release a deprecated feature, you know that there is always someone that is going to use it and later complain when it is gone :-) As for the DTD, could it go in the package where the DocumentBuilderFactory lives? If the XML files are not valid, how are you going to use them - guess what is missing? I'd say force them to be valid as long as whe throw a clearly worded exception if they are not. --Thomas > I knew I forgot some further questions: > > - Where should the DTD go? > - Should we require all XML files to be valid? > > - How long should I retain the present backward compatibility in parsing > XML? 0.8? 0.9? Break it now? > > Regards, > Rod > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay > Get office equipment for less on eBay! > http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > |