[Springframework-developer] =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:[Springframework-developer]_RE:_[Springframework-developer]_Spring_bean_factory_XML_format?=

[=?iso-8859-1?Q?<jp....@ti...>]

In addition, using the first way ( the same element with either refid att=
r either value attr) will be coherent with what is to do with properties =
which haven't an array. =0D=0A=0D=0AWe don't have a property and a refPro=
perty element. We could have the same remark at this level.=0D=0A=0D=0AOn=
 all cases, the two levels, "property" and "element" must have the same l=
ogic. Either byReference elements are distinct either they are not but us=
ing "refid".=0D=0A=0D=0AJean-Pierre=0D=0A=0D=0A---------- Initial Header =
-----------=0D=0A=0D=0AFrom      : springframework-developer-admin@lists.=
sourceforge.net=0D=0ATo          : "juergen.hoeller" <juergen.hoeller@wer=
k3at.com>=0D=0ACc          : "springframework-developer" <springframework=
-dev...@li...>=0D=0ADate      : Wed, 28 May 2003 13:03=
:46 +0200=0D=0ASubject : [Springframework-developer] RE: [Springframework=
-developer] Spring bean factory XML format=0D=0A=0D=0AHi Juergen,=0D=0A=0D=
=0AI don't agree. The element passes a value, directly or by reference. B=
ut the job is the same. Making the difference in the used attribute will =
suffice. There is no nature difference between the two cases. Having a co=
herent collection (only one kind of sub-elements) should take precedence.=
 =0D=0AIf a reference element should have much more particular properties=
, the scenario could be the other way, but still it's not.=0D=0A=0D=0AJea=
n-Pierre=0D=0A =0D=0A=0D=0A---------- Initial Header -----------=0D=0A=0D=
=0AFrom      : spr...@li...=0D=0A=
To          : <spr...@li...>=0D=0ACc  =
        : =0D=0ADate      : Wed, 28 May 2003 12:41:39 +0200=0D=0ASubject =
: RE: [Springframework-developer] Spring bean factory XML format=0D=0A=0D=
=0AWhat about mixing references and values in a collection? Would it look=
 as follows:=0D=0A=0D=0A<bean id=3D"foo">=0D=0A <property name=3D"moo">mo=
o</property>=0D=0A <property name=3D"coll">=0D=0A  <element refid=3D"alph=
a"/>=0D=0A  <element refid=3D"beta"/>=0D=0A  <element>gamma</element>=0D=0A=
 </property>=0D=0A</bean>=0D=0A=0D=0ARod's proposed syntax would be like =
this:=0D=0A=0D=0A<bean id=3D"foo">=0D=0A <property name=3D"moo">moo</prop=
erty>=0D=0A <property name=3D"coll">=0D=0A   <ref refid=3D"alpha"/>=0D=0A=
   <ref refid=3D"beta"/>=0D=0A   <value>gamma</value>=0D=0A </property>=0D=
=0A</bean>=0D=0A=0D=0AI tend to prefer the latter, as it clearly separate=
s references and values.=0D=0A=0D=0AJuergen=0D=0A=0D=0A=0A=0A********** S=
PECIAL ADSL **********=0AL'ADSL =E0 partir de 15,95 EUR/mois et le modem =
ADSL offert ?  C'est en exclusivit=E9 chez Tiscali !=0APour profiter de c=
ette offre, cliquez ici: http://register.tiscali.fr/adsl/=0AOffre soumise=
 =E0 conditions.=0A