|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2003-05-27 09:21:50
|
> As noted in build.xml, this could be made obsolete by using the thread context class loader within the framework, for loading classes and other resources like bundles. I've already prototyped this, it's simple and seems to work nicely. Note that it is advisable to keep the Spring JARs in your application lib directory anyway, you won't be confronted with these problems in any case then. There's no choice, of course, ifyour application server uses the EJB classloader as parent of your web app classloader - though this should work equally well with the thread context approach. Are you proposing changing to context loader? I think it's probably a good idea, as otherwise I suspect we may encounter ongoing problems. I can't envisage any problems with context loading (although I'm sure any approach will fail in some servers without code changes :-) While your packaging sounds logical, maybe this would enable simpler packaging. But I guess the "skeleton" approach could show what Jars were needed for EJB apps etc. Regards, Rod |