|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2003-05-07 08:33:57
|
Yes, I noticed this. I'll change it. ----- Original Message ----- From: "jürgen höller [werk3AT]" <jue...@we...> To: <spr...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 8:44 AM Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] ejb.access package I've used DynamicProxy for suppressing close calls on connections from SingleConnectionDataSource, via DataSourceUtils.getCloseSuppressingConnectionProxy. If you'd like to use a different proxy, just adapt DataSourceUtils, and I'm fine :-) Juergen -----Original Message----- From: Rod Johnson [mailto:rod...@in...] Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 9:39 AM To: spr...@li... Subject: [Springframework-developer] ejb.access package Guys, I would like to remove the ejb.access EJB proxy stuff before 1.0. Just wondering who is using it. If you can send me a section of your bean file definition, I'll try to produce the alternative version. Also the DynamicProxy class will eventually go. Is anyone using this? The recommended way forward is an AOP-based proxy. I will put together an example. It should be no harder to use. Regards, Rod ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |