Re: [Springframework-developer] MagicDraw license for Spring project

[Isabelle M. <isa...@me...>]

Hi Gary,

Apparently more of us are interested in using the professional edition. For example, Thomas Risberg has started using it to generate the data model for our tutorial. See http://www.tridb.org/spring.html.

Isabelle

On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 08:23:52AM -0500, Gary Duncanson wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> How many people are involved in the effort? I see that you would have need
> for both the professional and standard editions. What I could do is provide
> you with a few standard copies and a single floating professional to be used
> for the Spring Framework Project only.
> 
> Would this suite your needs?
> 
> For our part, we would like a quote from you for our web page and a link
> from your project site to MagicDraw.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Gary Duncanson,
> Executive Vice President,
> Sales and Marketing
> No Magic, Inc. USA
> 800 East Campbell Road, STE 199
> Richardson, TX 75081
> Direct:  972-527-9377
> Fax:   972-527-9470
> Mobile & Pager: 469-222-5966
> E-mail: ga...@no...
> WWW: http://www.nomagic.com
> 
> 
> Thomas Risberg wrote:
> 
> > Gary,
> >
> > I understand that Isabelle Muszynski has been in contact with you
> > regarding using MagicDraw for our open source project "Spring
> > Framework".  I joined the group in February and I have been working on
> > enhancements to the JDBC framework.  I have a 20+ year career as a
> > database developer (you can view my resume at
> > http://www.tridb.com/resume.php) and working on this JDBC framework is
> > really exciting, since it makes dealing with the details of the API soo
> > much easier.
> >
> > It would be a great benefit if we could use MagicDraw for documenting
> > the sample applications and tutorials that we are planning to develop.
> > In addition to modeling Java classes, I would also use MagicDraw to
> > develop any database models using the Data Modeling Profile for the UML.
> >  That would allow us to use one single tool for all our modeling needs.
> >
> > I have occasionally used the MagicDraw demo version, and I actually
> > prefer it to Together when I am modeling at a higher level and when I am
> > not interested in synchronizing with my Java code.  I work for TargetRx,
> > Inc (www.targetrx.com) and if we did not already  have a sizeable
> > investment in ERwin and Together, than I would definitely have
> > considered MagicDraw for our modeling needs.
> >
> > If you have any questions you can e-mail me at tri...@ta... or
> > tri...@tr....
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Thomas Risberg
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Isabelle Muszynski
Software Engineer
Zandweellaan 4
2660 Antwerpen
Belgium
Tel. 32-(0)3-830 18 54
Mobile: 32-(0)485 49 50 89
Email: isa...@me...
Website: www.meta-logix.com