Re: [Springframework-developer] Added named parameter support for SimpleJdbcTemplate

[<don...@gm...>]

On 5/15/07, Thomas Risberg <tho...@tr...> wrote:
If anyone can come up with a better way of instantiating this:
> ParameterizedBeanPropertyRowMapper<Customer>(Customer.class) - then that
> would be great, I haven't found a way of avoiding specifying Customer
> twice there due to the type erasure.
>
This won't avoid specifiying the class twice but it will ensure they
are the same:
public ParameterizedBeanPropertyRowMapper(Class<T> mappedClass)
instead of
public ParameterizedBeanPropertyRowMapper(Class mappedClass)

  Donnchadh