|
From: Colin Y. <col...@gm...> - 2006-07-29 16:56:44
|
I agree, simply because those two paragraphs could be talking about tags in general ;) Even if it was as simple as <form:static name="abc" value="efg"/> it would allow the form:xxx tags to be extensive, as well as internally consistent. They would also have the added value of taking part in any nested bind paths (assuming the others do that???) Just my 0.78 cents ;) Col On 29/07/06, Thomas Risberg <tho...@tr...> wrote: > > I don't have a problem with the plain html. It works well, but you > need to have an understanding of how the Spring binding works. This > is hidden by the <form:xxx> tags. > > From a language perspective it would be nice to have the ability to > use a <form:xxx> tag on anything that gets submitted with the page > including the submit button. That would make it clear what gets > submitted by just looking at the jsp code. I think this would be > beneficial for programmers that don't do a lot of web programming. > Just a thought. > > Thomas > > > On Jul 27, 2006, at 6:05 PM, Rob Harrop wrote: > > > I can always add the ability to use the form tags for this if you'd > > like :) > > > > I just think the plain HTML works pretty nicely here as well. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > |