|
From: Rob H. <rob...@in...> - 2006-02-16 13:55:33
|
I haven't really thought about that in any detail. I'm reticent to have to maintain two sets of tags but if there is a pressing need for the customization offered by the 2.0 tags then I'll finish them up, include them and maintain them. I tried to make the 1.2 tags so there would be very little need for customization - they are essentially atomic units of rendering with every possible changeable value (that I can think of) exposed as an attribute. Rob Colin Sampaleanu wrote: > Rob, > > What is the plan with the JSP 2.0 specific tags that were originally > attached to the Jira issue for JSP tags? In a 2.0 environment the 2.0 > specific versions are still nicer I think due to easier customization... > > > On 2/15/2006 6:51 AM, Rob Harrop wrote: > >> All, >> >> I committed the new JSP tag library to CVS recently and I would >> appreciate all feedback. You'll find tags there for most form >> elements and for rendering errors inside a <span>. From my usage in >> simple applications these new tags are much simpler than the existing >> bind tags. This tag library is designed for JSP 1.2 and above. To get >> started look for the spring-form.tld and go from there. JavaDoc for >> the tag classes is pretty much complete and Rick will be adding a JSP >> tag library showcase to CVS over the next few weeks. >> >> Rob >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log > files > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > -- Rob Harrop Principal Consultant Interface21 - Spring Services from the Source http://www.springframework.com |