|
From: Magnus H. <ma...@fi...> - 2005-11-24 07:37:02
|
2005/11/23, Rob Harrop <rob...@in...>: > The code from the blog entry you suggested will make it into the 1.3 > release in time for RC1. Also, I am hoping to release DIIFactoryBean in > RC2 which should give you plenty of options. > > The AspectJ solution is certainly my preference. This is very cool! :-) So, using this stuff and some implementation of SPR-1047, I can configure all beans using just a @Bean annotation and be sure that my dependencies are setup ok? Are there any thoughts on not needing the setter method for required properties? I mean, if you have a @RequiredProperty or simular set on a property that should be validated, why also have a setter? Something like the EJB3 @Resource annotation I guess. /Magnus |