Re: [Springframework-developer] Re: TypedMapFactory?

[Rob H. <rob...@in...>]

Exactly that.We can find that a method is declared to return a 
paramerized type and that its arguments are parameterized. Based on this 
we can have something like:

setMyMap(Map<String, Integer>)

And at runtime see the parameterization for the Map.

Oliver Hutchison wrote:

>>On the other hand, when it comes to method signatures, my 
>>understanding is that the bounding information is available 
>>through reflection. So you can tell that a method takes a 
>>List<String> and not a List. I'm not 100% sure on this (and 
>>confirmation by anybody would be good), but I presume this is 
>>what Rob is basing his statement below on.
>>    
>>
> 
>This is correct - Java 1.5 does keep generic type information relating
>to fields and method signatures (accessible using the new #getGeneric*
>methods on Field and Method). I'm taking advantage of this for type
>inference in Spring Rich's data binding system.
>
>Ollie
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
>Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course
>Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005
>Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information
>_______________________________________________
>Springframework-developer mailing list
>Spr...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>  
>

-- 
Rob Harrop
Principal Consultant
Interface21 - Spring Services from the Source
http://www.springframework.com