Re: [Springframework-developer] 1.2 maintenance branch

[Colin S. <col...@ex...>]

My convention when making a branch is to use the same basic name as the 
release, i.e.
R_1-2-5
becomes
B_1-2-5
where you then might have a release
R_1-2-5-1
coming off it later.

But I guess in this case any release is going to be 1.2.6.

So I would probably call it branch-1-2. I do like to call branches as 
branches, since they have to be treated differently than normal tags.

Colin


Juergen Hoeller wrote:

>Developers,
>
>I intend to create a Spring 1.2 maintenance branch now that 1.2.5 has been
>released. Not a problem per se, but I'm wondering about the branch name :-)
>
>We have "release-1-2-5" style as tag names, so what could we use as
>maintenance branch name? "maintenance-1-2"? "1-2-maintenance"? Any
>suggestions?
>
>Juergen
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>SF.Net email is sponsored by:
>Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
>it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
>Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
>_______________________________________________
>Springframework-developer mailing list
>Spr...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>  
>