Re: [Springframework-developer] 1.2.5 release

[Juergen H. <ju...@in...>]

Thomas,

Do you have the chance to move those classes to the sandbox, potentially
holding the JdbcTemplate extensions in a special JdbcTemplate subclass for
the time being? I can do that move as well, of course, but I don't want to
infer with any local changes you might already have made but not committed
yet.

In general, we should have clarified the role of CVS HEAD. We need
definitive announcements once HEAD turns to the next major release.
Currently it still serves as basis for 1.2.5, which will then lead to a
1.2.x maintenance branch (for potential future patches), with CVS HEAD
becoming the basis for 1.3.

Juergen
 

-----Original Message-----
From: spr...@li...
[mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf Of
Thomas Risberg
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 2:20 PM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] 1.2.5 release

Juergen,

I'd prefer to keep the named parameters for a 1.3RC1 release - there are
still some lose ends and little testing has been done on most of it.

Thomas


On Sep 9, 2005, at 6:35 AM, Juergen Hoeller wrote:

> Everyone,
>
> I'm inclined to do a Spring 1.2.5 release before going for 1.3 RC1:
> resolving the already known issues in the 1.2.x line, as reported on 
> our JIRA and partly already fixed in CVS (currently with target 1.3 
> RC1). The
> 1.2.5 release, if desired, would have to happen end of next week.
> Afterwards, CVS HEAD would be dedicated to 1.3 development, with a 1.2 
> maintenance branch alongside.
>
> Ideally, the 1.2.5 release would include all minor fixes done since
> 1.2.4
> (there were quite a few, including javadoc fixes). Hence, I would like 
> to create it from CVS HEAD rather than from a 1.2.4 branch. This means 
> that already committed 1.3 features would have to be temporarily moved 
> to the sandbox, unless we decide to release them in 1.2.5 already.
>
> The request log filter and named JDBC statement parameters are 
> candidates for 1.2.5, I guess, as they have been planned for 1.2.x 
> initially.
> Thomas,
> if you'd like to not release named JDBC statement parameters before
> 1.3 RC1,
> I would temporarily move it to the sandbox and back after the actual 
> 1.2.5 release. I'll leave that decision up to you.
>
> Regards,
>
> Juergen
>
> -----
> Juergen Hoeller
> Interface21 - Spring Services from the Source 
> http://www.springframework.com
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO 
> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle 
> Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams 
> * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * 
> http://www.sqe.com/ bsce5sf 
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list 
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
>
>



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September
19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile &
Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security
* Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer