[Springframework-developer] Re: difference in how interceptors work w/ TransactionProxyFactoryBean and ProxyFactoryBean?

[Tim K. <tim...@gm...>]

Following up on the previous email I sent yesterday, I explored one more=20
scenario. Since the hiearchy for the 'Service' interface is like this.

Service=20
-'.get()'

+ TopicService (extends Service)
- .getTopicList()
- .getTopicChildren()

And as I've mentioned in my previous email, the Acegi security method=20
interceptor does not seem to be kicking in on the 'get()' method when calle=
d=20
on a TopicService implementation, although it does kick in for the other tw=
o=20
methods defined under TopicService when using ProxyFactoryBean and=20
'interceptorNames' property.=20

So I tested out earlier today what would happen if I defined the 'get()'=20
method at the TopicService interface level, and updated the security method=
=20
interceptor from

com.vivakos.vps.service.Service.get=3DTOPIC_AFTER_ACL_READ

to=20

com.vivakos.vps.service.content.Topic.get=3DTOPIC_AFTER_ACL_READ

And the result is that it worked. So, I'm hoping that someone with a better=
=20
understanding of what the differences between the ProxyFactoryBean advising=
=20
process and the TransactionProxyFactoryBean would be - could clarify what i=
s=20
going on, since to me, they should work the same?

Thanks.

-tim