Re: [Springframework-developer] CVS pruning

[Colin S. <col...@ex...>]

Yes, I was still planning to go over the list one more time :-). I 
haven't written anything to SF yet...

Colin

Keith Donald wrote:

>Colin said:
>->This should leave the following modules in place
>-> - 'i21'
>-> - 'samples'
>-> - 'spring'
>-> - 'spring-beandoc'
>
>Colin,
>
>You meant to include spring-projects as another module to leave in place,
>right?
>
>What goes in "i21" and "samples"?  I wasn't aware they were being used.
>
>Keith
>
>  
>
>>As per the email below, I am going to submit a support request to SF to
>>remove the following obsolete or wrongly checked in modules from
>>Spring's CVS on SourceForge:
>>-  'Spring' (this is an empty module created with the wrong case, not to
>>be confused with the main Spring source, in the 'spring' module)
>>- 'common-build'
>>- 'repository'
>>- 'spring-binding'
>>- 'spring-modules'
>>- 'spring-rcp' (this is the old home of Spring-rcp (which is now hosted
>>in it's own sourceforge project, 'spring-rich-c')
>>- 'spring-webflow'
>>- 'spring-ide' (this is the old home of Spring-IDE, which is now hosted
>>in it's own Subversion repo elsewhere, managed by Torsten and co.).
>>
>>This should leave the following modules in place
>>- 'i21'
>>- 'samples'
>>- 'spring'
>>- 'spring-beandoc'
>>
>>I have no idea if SF will honour such a request from any project
>>developer, or it needs to be one of the leads (Rod or Juergen in our
>>case). If I'm told it's the latter, I'll notify Rod and Juergen to send
>>in the request themselves.
>>
>>Colin
>>
>>
>>Colin Sampaleanu wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Yes. I'm just getting confirmation from Torsten/Christian that the old
>>>spring-ide module in CVS can be kileld (all the Spring-IDE) source is
>>>in their own Subversion repo now, then I'll publish a list of what
>>>modules are staying and which are being pruned, and submit a service
>>>request to SF.
>>>
>>>
>>>Erwin Vervaet wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Okay, I've moved my Eclipse over to use the new spring-projects module.
>>>>So I guess we can have the SF people clean up those bogus modules?
>>>>
>>>>Erwin Vervaet
>>>>erw...@er...
>>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Colin Sampaleanu"
>>>><col...@ex...>
>>>>To: "Keith Donald" <ke...@in...>; "Erwin Vervaet"
>>>><erw...@er...>
>>>>Cc: <spr...@li...>
>>>>Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 4:44 AM
>>>>Subject: Building webflow under spring-projects
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>Keith/Erwin,
>>>>>
>>>>>I moved (copied really) all common-build, spring-binding, and
>>>>>spring-webflow sources to live under a new spring-projects module in
>>>>>CVS.
>>>>>
>>>>>Note that the build relies on the use of a nightly snapshot of ivy
>>>>>  ivy-20050616204129.jar
>>>>>which may be found in
>>>>>  spring-projects\repository\jayasoft\ivy\jars
>>>>>This should be dropped into your ant lib dir to replace the older
>>>>>ivy 1.1. This If you try to use ivy 1.1 you'll get a failure when
>>>>>trying to do a publish of the generated artifact.
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>--
>>Colin Sampaleanu
>>Interface21 Principal Consultant
>>Spring Training, Consulting and Support - "From the Source"
>>http://www.springframework.com
>>
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
>>from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
>>informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
>>speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
>>_______________________________________________
>>Springframework-developer mailing list
>>Spr...@li...
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>


-- 
Colin Sampaleanu
Interface21 Principal Consultant
Spring Training, Consulting and Support - "From the Source"
http://www.springframework.com