Re: [Springframework-developer] Rules code missing?

[Colin S. <col...@ex...>]

Erwin Vervaet wrote:

>> I'm not incredibly attached (or at all) to spring-modules as the name 
>> of the CVS module for the new stuff. Any name is ok as long as we're 
>> all ok with it. What about:
>>  spring-projects
>>  projects
>>
>> Any other suggestions are welcome.
>
>
> What about spring-parts? or spring-components?
> I also pretty much like "spring-projects", as you suggest.
>
> Arguably "spring-modules" is pretty much on the money. Maybe the 
> Java.net stuff is unfortunately named: "spring-extensions" or 
> something to that extent would have been more appropriate.

Well yeah, that's why I went with spring-modules despite the java.net 
project. I had been thinking of that name before the java.net project 
every existed. I guess I'll go with spring-projects. The intent is after 
all that the main projects which make up the various core spring 
projects move there...


-- 
Colin Sampaleanu
Interface21 Principal Consultant
Spring Training, Consulting and Support - "From the Source"
http://www.springframework.com