Re: [Springframework-developer] Rules code missing?

[Alexandru P. <apo...@ez...>]

#: by Colin Sampaleanu's words the mind was *winged* :#
> Juergen,
> 
> Sure, you're right. Java.net has a horrific UI and that combined with 
> the fact that it's just one project on the java.net site means (IMHO) 
> it's pretty much of a failure as as a 'Spring-Forge'; I can't see any 
> real reason why any of those libs would not want to move over to any 
> sort of decent CVS or SVN infrastructure we set up, but most if not all 
> will still  remain separate to a large degree, with another group of 
> developers/committers, even in that eventuality.
> 
> I'm not incredibly attached (or at all) to spring-modules as the name of 
> the CVS module for the new stuff. Any name is ok as long as we're all ok 
> with it. What about:
>   spring-projects
>   projects
> 

What about spring-extensions?

:alex |.::the_mindstorm::.|

> Any other suggestions are welcome. The common-build system has been in 
> there for a while. spring-binding and spring-webflow are now in and 
> compiling. If we can come up with a name that is good for everybody, 
> I'll import the source to a new module by that name. Then we can send a 
> request to SF to clean up the old module and all the other obsolete 
> modules in there....
> 
> Colin
>  
> 
> Juergen Hoeller wrote:
> 
>>From my point of view, Spring Modules at java.net has mainly been set up to
>>create a separate distribution and community for non-core modules,
>>maintained by a separate set of developers. That Spring Modules project
>>essentially focuses on integration of more exotic third-party products and
>>on further non-core modules.
>>
>>So in my opinion, it's not quite like they're simply gonna be merged over
>>once we move away from SourceForge CVS. This will have to remain separate to
>>some degree. Remember that they even use a separate namespace:
>>"org.springmodules"...
>>
>>In any case, calling two different things "Spring modules" isn't a good idea
>>by any means, not even as a temporary measure. Could we please get all our
>>heads together and clarify this? Rob, Keith, Colin, myself?
>>
>>Juergen
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: spr...@li...
>>[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf
>>Of Colin Sampaleanu
>>Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 6:22 PM
>>To: spr...@li...
>>Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Rules code missing?
>>
>>
>>Andy Depue wrote:
>>
>>  
>>
>>>On Tuesday 14 June 2005 08:35 am, Colin Sampaleanu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>>>Not at all. We're however breaking stuff up into proper related projects
>>>>with dependencies expressed properly via Ivy config files (still using
>>>>Ant for the build). Binding and WebFlow are now in their own projects in
>>>>the spring-modules CVS module at _SourceForge_. I'm not 100% clear on
>>>>why the rules stuff is moving to the java.net Spring-Modules project. I
>>>>need to talk to Keith about that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      
>>>>
>>>I could see it being confusing that there are two spring-modules projects.
>>>Must it be so?
>>>
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>It's just a module name... But the idea is that once we move to our own
>>CVS or SVN the java.net Spring-Modules dies. At that point we have
>>fine-grained permissions on each module, and no more performance
>>problems, which were the two main reasons to ever set up the java.net
>>Spring Modules prject...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
>>from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
>>informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
>>speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
>>_______________________________________________
>>Springframework-developer mailing list
>>Spr...@li...
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>>
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
>>from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
>>informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
>>speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
>>_______________________________________________
>>Springframework-developer mailing list
>>Spr...@li...
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>>  
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
> 
>