|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2005-06-14 16:21:51
|
Andy Depue wrote: >On Tuesday 14 June 2005 08:35 am, Colin Sampaleanu wrote: > > >>Not at all. We're however breaking stuff up into proper related projects >>with dependencies expressed properly via Ivy config files (still using >>Ant for the build). Binding and WebFlow are now in their own projects in >>the spring-modules CVS module at _SourceForge_. I'm not 100% clear on >>why the rules stuff is moving to the java.net Spring-Modules project. I >>need to talk to Keith about that. >> >> >> >I could see it being confusing that there are two spring-modules projects. >Must it be so? > > It's just a module name... But the idea is that once we move to our own CVS or SVN the java.net Spring-Modules dies. At that point we have fine-grained permissions on each module, and no more performance problems, which were the two main reasons to ever set up the java.net Spring Modules prject... |