RE: [Springframework-developer] spring xdoclet module

[Craig W. <cr...@ha...>]

>   i'm more then willing to submit patches if someone could provide some
> overall guidence on how they would like to see things evolve.

I've got some ideas, but I'll leave it to others to provide their ideas as
well.

>   which jira system should these ideas/patches be submitted too? spring
> or
> xdoclet?

Definitely the XDoclet JIRA, as the module is an XDoclet module.
Furthermore, many in the Spring camp are disinterested (or even dead-set
against) the Spring XDoclet module.

>
> --
> -jae
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: spr...@li...
> [mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf
> Of Craig Walls
> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 12:31 PM
> To: spr...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] spring xdoclet module
>
>
> I initially added the Spring tags. What's there is the result of what I
> was using on a project, but nothing else. It has been my intent to go
> back and look for opportunities to enhance it, but I simply haven't had
> the time.
>
> I think that there's a lot of opportunity here, especially WRT to
> creating tags for controllers. I'm thinking that instead of using
> @spring.bean to declare a controller, you might have @spring.controller
> which abstracts away all of the stuff that goes along with a controller.
> Likewise, you've identified some opportunities with remoting.
>
> All of this is good stuff, but as I mentioned, my other priorities have
> prevented me from revisiting this stuff. You should certainly feel free
> to submit enhancement ideas in JIRA and perhaps someone could get around
> to implementing your ideas. Or you could even submit patches.
>
>>
>>   are there any plans to add further enhancements to the xdoclet
>> module for spring? is it even "maintained" by anyone involved directly
>>  w/ spring?
>>
>>   i feel that the @spring.bean tag is somewhat limiting because it
>> does not let me define a class name, and instead just assumes that it
>> should create an entry for that class. while this is true most of the
>> time, in instances where i might be using a MultiActionController,
>> it'd be nice if i could specify the MethodNameResolver configuration
>> in the same class since the two are directly related.
>>
>>   there are also other minor additions, such as being able to generate
>>
>> remote interfaces from business interfaces when using remoting (i
>> already achieve this through a simple doclet template), creating
>> "standard" tags for some bean definitions (ie: jaxrpc proxy)  that i
>> feel would be great additions. is anyone else interested in these
>> types of enhancements?
>>
>> --
>> -jae
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be
> the first software developer in space?
> Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
> Want to be the first software developer in space?
> Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer