|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2005-05-16 13:28:20
|
Darren Davison wrote: >On Fri, May 6, 2005 16:53, Colin Sampaleanu said: > > >>Darren Davison wrote: >> >> >> >>>On Fri, May 6, 2005 7:32, Erwin Vervaet said: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>* If you click "Development > Continuous Build" you go to a somewhat messed >>>>up page that has the old look & feel. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>the continuous build page is on the SF project web servers as I never had SSH >>>(or FTP) access to the springframework.org site. Materials from the compile >>>farm are transferred from there to my home server then up to the web server. >>> >>>I can either replicate the new look and feel on the project web space at SF >>>or >>>transfer the material up to the new servers if preferred. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>You certainly _can_ get ssh access into the new host, although that >>doesn't get it into the CMS anyway. So if it stays as static HTML >>content, I'm not so sure it necessarilly adds much value to push the >>stuff to the new host. The builds are on SF anyway, and keeping the data >>there means there's means the page can probably be updated more easily, >>and there's reduced bandwidth usage on the new host as people will >>access the data from SF instead... >> >> > >finally got round to updated the L&F for the continuous build page: >http://springframework.sourceforge.net/test/ > >May get out of sync if the navigation changes on the main site but the CSS and >images are referenced from there directly. > > Cool! If we are worried about getting out of sync, I think one option would be to just keep on using the CSS and images, but have a minimal menu only with a link to the real site; that way it would be clear to people that they are on another site. Colin |