Menu
▾
▴
RE: [Springframework-developer] Portlet MVC Status
|
From: Tim K. <tim...@vi...> - 2005-05-12 15:37:02
|
We too have an interest in the portlet integration with Spring, and this state of limbo is starting to get a bit distressing. I suspect that Juergen's simply trying to get 1.2 out the door - and that once he does so tomorrow, there will be more progress on this end when 1.3 dev begins in earnest - at least I hope so. I don't profess to know what exactly is on the Spring developer's minds right now. :) -tim -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf Of John Lewis Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 7:55 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: [Springframework-developer] Portlet MVC Status It's been over a month since this discussion and there is still no progress on merging together the contributions to the Portlet MVC framework. Several of us are working with this framework on critical projects and would really like to start moving it forward in a reliable direction. Would it be better for us to start a separate sourceforge or java.net project for this until we can work on merging back into Spring proper, or is there some light at the end of this tunnel? > Juergen Hoeller wrote: > >> That sounds like a good plan to me! It would be great to get this going >> ASAP. After all, our timeplan for Spring 1.3 is pretty aggressive, so >> waiting till after 1.2 final might not leave enough time. >> >> Bill, Dmitriy, anyone volunteering to manage the sandbox code in the >> meantime? :-) This would have to be someone with commit rights, after >> all, >> and ideally someone already using the Portlet code. > >> First step would be to merge all existing contributions in. Let's assume >> that the Portlet code will become part of Spring 1.3 proper (which is >> likely), and continue to work on it in the sandbox. >> >> Juergen >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: spr...@li... >> [mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf >> Of Rainer Schmitz >> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:53 AM >> To: spr...@li... >> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Re: Portlet Form Controllers >> >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> While the "official" work on the Portlet support are postponed to Spring >> 1.3 I still would like to have a place for discussions and code >> contributions. At this time the discussion is spread across this list, >> the forum, confluence, and JIRA, which makes it hard to follow. >> >> As for discussions, I would propose to stick to this list - we *are* >> talking about Spring development, and this way the experienced Spring >> developers may take the opportunity to participate. >> >> As for code contributios: during the past couple of month several people >> (William, Nick, John, and me) have contributed some code, but after each >> contribution there was a big gap. One reason might be that it's very >> inconvenient to get the up-to-date version of the code (none of the >> changes made it into CVS; you have to fetch the sandbox version and copy >> the content of several zip files from confluence). Without a proper code >> management facility it's pointless to add more contributions. >> >> I'm undecided wether portlet support should be part of main Spring or a >> sub project, but for the time being it would really help if the portlet >> code would be located at a place where all interested people could find >> the up-to-date version and contribute enhancements. When the official >> work in the Spring 1.3 context begins, this code could be an >> implementation base for any portlet code handled in the traditional way. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Rainer >> >> >> >> Juergen Hoeller schrieb: >> >>> John, >>> >>> Sorry for the late reply. Thanks for volunteering! :-) >>> >>> Let's continue to proceed in the Portlet area once Spring 1.2 is >>> out. Both >>> Spring Web Flows and the Portlet support are currently planned to be >>> cornerstones of Spring 1.3. >>> >>> Regarding commit rights, let's discuss this once 1.2 is out too. We're >>> willing to extend the developer team, but there's a couple of things >>> to be >>> clarified (CLA etc). >>> >>> In the meantime, feel free to create a JIRA issue for your >>> enhancements! >> >> >> I'm >> >>> sure that Dmitriy, Bill and co will be happy to have an early look at >> >> >> this. >> >>> Juergen >>> >>> >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org >> >> iD8DBQFCSnb7w+xsU7A7UOgRAo39AJ9LlKn1KvEOFzItXO83+oUoUhvMHgCfWoVy >> rv556WE9CYsBzgbrTtkRqLU= >> =qCQl >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. >> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >> _______________________________________________ >> Springframework-developer mailing list >> Spr...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. >> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >> _______________________________________________ >> Springframework-developer mailing list >> Spr...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
