|
From: Matt R. <li...@ra...> - 2005-04-14 04:40:24
|
I tried it and the springmodules-validator-dev-20050413.jar seems to be
missing the taglib.tld in the META-INF directory. I built the project
using "ant alljars".
0 Wed Apr 13 22:12:46 MDT 2005 META-INF/
217 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
0 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/
0 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/springmodules/
0 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/springmodules/commons/
0 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/springmodules/commons/validator/
0 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005
org/springmodules/commons/validator/taglib/
2392 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005
org/springmodules/commons/validator/BeanValidator.class
4596 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005
org/springmodules/commons/validator/DefaultValidatorFactory.class
11261 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005
org/springmodules/commons/validator/FieldChecks.class
3404 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005
org/springmodules/commons/validator/NamedBeanValidator.class
4625 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005
org/springmodules/commons/validator/Resources.class
2974 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005
org/springmodules/commons/validator/ValidatorAdaptor.class
446 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005
org/springmodules/commons/validator/ValidatorFactory.class
1305 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005
org/springmodules/commons/validator/taglib/
JavascriptValidatorTag$1.class
13579 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005
org/springmodules/commons/validator/taglib/JavascriptValidatorTag.class
This results in the following error:
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: /index.jsp(1,1) The absolute uri:
http://www.springmodules.org/tags/spring-commons-validator cannot be
resolved in either web.xml or the jar files deployed with this
application
at
org.apache.jasper.compiler.DefaultErrorHandler.jspError(DefaultErrorHand
ler.java:39)
BTW, is there any way to have a shorter URI - something like
http://www.springmodules.org/tags/validator?
Thanks,
Matt
On Apr 13, 2005, at 8:46 PM, Thomas Risberg wrote:
> I have moved the Commons Validator support over to springmodules. I
> did not make any changes other than the package names and
> copyright/license notices. There are quite a few deprecated methods -
> I guess some of the code is for an older version.
>
> The new package name is org.springmodules.commons.validator
> and the new uri for the taglib is
> http://www.springmodules.org/tags/spring-commons-validator
>
> Matt, since you seem to be the primary user of this support, could you
> check the new code out and test it?
>
> Thomas
>
>
> On Apr 13, 2005, at 5:40 PM, Rob Harrop wrote:
>
>> Thomas,
>>
>> If you are willing to work on it, I am happy for you to move it to
>> Spring Modules now. I don't see any harm in including what is there
>> in a 0.1 release if you are happy with it.
>>
>> Rob
>> On 13 Apr 2005, at 20:52, tho...@tr... wrote:
>>
>>> Rob,
>>>
>>> I'm currently working on a project where I will use Commons
>>> Validator outside of
>>> a Web MVC environment. I still would like to be able to wire it up
>>> using Spring
>>> and I have been playing around with what's in the sandbox. I have
>>> already
>>> changed the package names, so let me know when/if it is a good time
>>> to move
>>> this to springmodules CVS.
>>>
>>> I moved most of it to org.springmodules.validation.commons package
>>> except for
>>> the tag library which I put in
>>> org.springmodules.web.servlet.tags.validation.commons. I guess it
>>> makes sense
>>> to keep the package structure in org.springmodules the same as
>>> org.springframework so it's easier to move code between the projects.
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting Rob Harrop <rob...@in...>:
>>>
>>>> Well, I'll spend some time going through the sandbox and see what I
>>>> think is
>>>> a candidate for Spring Modules. I'll post the suggestions here and
>>>> if
>>>> everyone is happy I'll do the move. We have about 6 active
>>>> developers on SM
>>>> who are not core Spring devs, plus there is me so we may be able to
>>>> breath
>>>> some live back into the stuff in the sandbox.
>>>>
>>>> Rob
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Rob Harrop
>>>> Interface21 - Spring Services from the Source
>>>> http://www.springframework.com
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: spr...@li...
>>>> [mailto:spr...@li...] On
>>>> Behalf Of
>>>> Juergen Hoeller
>>>> Sent: 12 April 2005 22:17
>>>> To: spr...@li...
>>>> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Where does webflow live?
>>>>
>>>> Ah, our favorite topic once again ;-)
>>>>
>>>> I'm not entirely sure whether Web Flow will get its own module;
>>>> could be too
>>>> fine-granular. The binding framework quite certainly shouldn't,
>>>> which would
>>>> already cause a problem with Web Flow's current status if we had
>>>> modules.
>>>>
>>>> To give some numbers: If we want to have the binding framework, JCA
>>>> support,
>>>> Hibernate support, Web Flow, etc as separate modules (which would be
>>>> necessary to get your desired effect of not putting any
>>>> early-access stuff
>>>> in the sandbox), we would end up with at least 35 modules (that's
>>>> our
>>>> top-level packages plus some subpackages of relevant size).
>>>> Frankly, I
>>>> consider that a horror scenario in terms of management and would
>>>> strongly
>>>> vote against it.
>>>>
>>>> I guess what I'm saying is that modules only *look* convincingly
>>>> easy, but
>>>> won't be a general solution for the early access problem in
>>>> practice. Keith,
>>>> please try to imagine this in detail and don't just consider it as
>>>> solution
>>>> upfront. This is absolutely non-trivial when looking at the details.
>>>>
>>>> Before we continue to spread the word on modules, I'd like to see
>>>> concrete
>>>> suggestions for module separation, respecting the interdependencies
>>>> outlined
>>>> in section 3 of our readme. I have already tried multiple times to
>>>> nail down
>>>> some options, and have always failed to find a convincing
>>>> separation.
>>>>
>>>> The current jar files (12) might be a starting point, but I'm not
>>>> sure that
>>>> they can serve as module granularity too... Some packages are joined
>>>> together there rather arbitrarily (from a source module
>>>> perspective), for
>>>> example the ones in spring-support.jar, or the separation between
>>>> spring-orm.jar (which includes the entire ORM support except for
>>>> Hibernate)
>>>> and spring-hibernate.jar. Those jar files cannot be mapped 1-to-1
>>>> to source
>>>> modules.
>>>>
>>>> So in total, it's unclear to me how a concrete module separation
>>>> could look
>>>> like (the more I look at it, the harder it seems). I doubt that we
>>>> can
>>>> resolve this within the 1.3 timeframe, given that we have such an
>>>> aggressive
>>>> schedule there, with just two months for multiple major new
>>>> features.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, the real problem here is the sandbox, IMO. There's too much
>>>> stuff in
>>>> there, both dead and somewhat alive. Noone should have to rely on
>>>> spring-sandbox.jar!! Everything that's of some use in there should
>>>> move,
>>>> either to the core or to Spring Modules.
>>>>
>>>> Juergen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: spr...@li...
>>>> [mailto:spr...@li...]On
>>>> Behalf
>>>> Of Keith Donald
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 9:24 PM
>>>> To: spr...@li...
>>>> Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Where does webflow live?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Aye, this is exactly why we need a modular CVS structure and a
>>>> smarter
>>>> build, which Colin is leading up in the post 1.2 timeframe.
>>>>
>>>> Web flow is currently maintained in the sandbox, yes. This means
>>>> it is also
>>>> included in spring-sandbox.jar when the 'sandboxjar' target is run.
>>>>
>>>> Independent of that fact, the webflow.release target ships
>>>> spring-webflow.jar and spring-webflow-support.jar, pulling in
>>>> _just_ the
>>>> required code from the sandbox needed to run spring webflow.
>>>>
>>>> So, I guess you can say we've taken the stance that people aren't
>>>> developing
>>>> apps with spring-sandbox.jar in their classpath. Hmm...
>>>>
>>>> In any case, in the future spring-webflow will be in its own module
>>>> with its
>>>> own distributable, along side other well-defined core modules, and
>>>> the
>>>> sandbox will die the death it deserves (or be only used for true
>>>> 'scratch'
>>>> stuff)
>>>>
>>>> Keith
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: spr...@li...
>>>> [mailto:spr...@li...] On
>>>> Behalf Of
>>>> Matt Raible
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 3:04 PM
>>>> To: spr...@li...
>>>> Subject: [Springframework-developer] Where does webflow live?
>>>>
>>>> I ran into some issues last night with spring-sandbox.jar from
>>>> Spring
>>>> 1.2 RC1 and Spring Web Flow PR2. The problem turned out to be that
>>>> many of the flow classes where already in my spring-sandbox.jar.
>>>> Once
>>>> I deleted them from spring-sandbox.jar, everything worked fine.
>>>> How do
>>>> I eliminate this duplication in the future? Is the web flow stuff
>>>> in
>>>> spring-sandbox.jar? The main reason I'm using the sandbox JAR is
>>>> for
>>>> Commons Validator.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Matt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real
>>>> users.
>>>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading
>>>> now.
>>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Springframework-developer mailing list
>>>> Spr...@li...
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-
>>>> developer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real
>>>> users.
>>>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading
>>>> now.
>>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Springframework-developer mailing list
>>>> Spr...@li...
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-
>>>> developer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real
>>>> users.
>>>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading
>>>> now.
>>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Springframework-developer mailing list
>>>> Spr...@li...
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-
>>>> developer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real
>>>> users.
>>>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading
>>>> now.
>>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Springframework-developer mailing list
>>>> Spr...@li...
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-
>>>> developer
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real
>>> users.
>>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Springframework-developer mailing list
>>> Spr...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-
>>> developer
>>>
>> --
>> Rob Harrop
>> Interface21 - Spring Services from the Source
>> http://www.springframework.com
>>
>> Lead Developer - AOP & JMX, Spring Framework:
>> http://www.springframework.org
>>
>> Author, "Pro Spring"
>> (February 2005, with Jan Machacek).
>> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1590594614/
>>
>> Author, "Pro Jakarta Velocity"
>> (August 2004).
>> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/159059410X/
>>
>> Author, "Pro Jakarta Struts"
>> (March 2004, with John Carnell).
>> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/159059228X/
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Interface21 Limited
>> Registered Office Summit House, 2-2a Highfield Road, Dartford, Kent
>> DA1 2JY
>> Registered in England and Wales No. 5187766
>> ____________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real
>> users.
>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
>> _______________________________________________
>> Springframework-developer mailing list
>> Spr...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real
> users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
|