Re: [Springframework-developer] Lucene Integration

[Brian M. <br...@ch...>]

Yep, just checked it in there =)

-Brian

On Apr 10, 2005, at 10:56 AM, Rob Harrop wrote:

> Brian,
>
> I think if no-one else has any objections, this module is ideal for
> inclusion in Spring Modules.
>
> Rob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: spr...@li...
> [mailto:spr...@li...] On 
> Behalf Of
> Brian McCallister
> Sent: 02 April 2005 22:36
> To: spr...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Lucene Integration
>
> snapshot of the classes as they are now:
>
> http://morphy.skife.org/spring-lucene/
>
> -Brian
>
> On Apr 2, 2005, at 4:19 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
>
>> I have a set of classes for Apache Lucene integration with Spring
>> (reasonable factory beans, a LuceneTemplate, and LuceneUtils) which
>> are designed to
>>
>> a) make it easier to work with Lucene from Spring (the template in
>> particular optimizes common cases nicely, and does the resource
>> open/closing like the other templates)
>>
>> b) make lucene index modifications abide by Spring's transaction
>> system by doing write-behind on adds (which are ignored on rollback)
>> and rolling back deletes via a transaction synchronization.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'd like to contribute them to Spring (if ya'll are interested), but
>> to clean up the code and design some first, I have a few questions:
>>
>> 1) Should transaction binding be "on" by default? Lucene is
>> semi-transactional by nature (supports r and r/w locks, changes are
>> flushed on reader/writer closing, etc), but I am not sure people
>> expect Lucene to be bound by other transactions. Potential confusion.
>>
>> 2) What is a good tx manager to use for the unit tests? I am using a
>> modified version of the TestTransactionManager in Spring right now
>> (just changed to make it accessible and use synchonrizations). It is
>> much easier to use the TransactionTemplate than to manually manage the
>> tx's for tests =)
>>
>> 3) Not all of the ~interesting things you can do in lucene are
>> convenient to expose (splitting indexes etc) from the configuration.
>> Right now, rather than make a hack, the factory beans only support
>> single indexes. The only multi-index thing exposed right now is really
>> a configuration option on the SearcherBean which allows for multiple
>> indexes and a MultiSearcher ~transparently.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -Brian
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real
>> users.
>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
>> _______________________________________________
>> Springframework-developer mailing list
>> Spr...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real 
> users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real 
> users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>