Re: [Springframework-developer] FW: package dependency

[Erwin V. <erw...@er...>]

NestedRuntimeException should really have been in util I guess, but it's =
to late to change that...

Erwin Vervaet
erw...@er...
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Keith Donald=20
  To: spr...@li...=20
  Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 6:48 PM
  Subject: [Springframework-developer] FW: package dependency


  Hey guys,

  =20

  Juergen and discussed this: a dependency on util -> core is NOT =
acceptable.  "core" is intended for higher-level utilities used =
throughout Spring, for generic, more complete abstractions like the =
Resource API.  It may depend on util, but not the other way around.  =
Util is intended for low-level helpers, and should not depend on any =
other package but stuff in JDK 1.3.  Both go in spring-core.jar.

  =20

  So in light of this, I'm relocating a good deal of packages from util =
to core, the closure, enums, comparator, and string styler support, =
respectively.  This seems much better and solves the problem I was =
facing: that is, a class needing NestedRuntimeException, which is in the =
core.

  =20

  Keith

  =20


-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

  From: Keith Donald [mailto:ke...@in...]=20
  Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 8:30 PM
  To: 'spr...@li...'
  Subject: package dependency

  =20

  Is a package dependency from "util" to "core" acceptable? I could =
really use NestedRuntimeException there...

  =20

  Keith

  =20

  Keith Donald

  http://www.springframework.com - Spring Training, Consulting and =
Support - "From the Source"

  =20