Re: [Springframework-developer] Fwd: webflow & security

[Colin S. <col...@ex...>]

Personally, I find J2EE container security completely useless (weak and 
pretty bad design) compared to something like Acegi Security. I'm not a 
very big fan of the idea of baking in J2EE security related code, 
although certainly it'd be good to structure the lib so that it's easy 
for users to add in either J2EE or Acegi Security related code.

-- 
Colin Sampaleanu
Interface21 Principal Consultant
Spring Training, Consulting and Support - "From the Source"
http://www.springframework.com


Steven Devijver wrote:

>Hi guys,
>
>What are you views on the topics below?
>
>Thanks
>
>Steven
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>From: Steven Devijver <ste...@gm...>
>Date: Mar 29, 2005 9:52 AM
>Subject: webflow & security
>To: spr...@li...
>
>
>Hi,
>
>It would be nice if webflow would support J2EE roles on a state level.
>This way one could set a read-only role on all states except a save or
>delete state which would have a management role.
>
>Next to that, ideally, it should be possible for the view technology
>to determine which buttons or anchors should or should not be rendered
>by checking the role of the current user with the role of the state
>linked to a given button or anchor.
>
>Steven
>
>--
>"If you want to be a different fish, you gotta jump out of the school."
>-- Captain Beefheart
>
>
>  
>