[Springframework-developer] Re: [Springframework-user] Velocity Layout Servlet (or ToolView)

[Juergen H. <ju...@in...>]

Good point regaring aopalliance in spring.jar, Thomas. I wouldn't mind
including those interfaces in spring-aop.jar and spring.jar: it's just about
10 KB, and hardly anyone accesses them standalone anyway.

Of course, the spring-framework-1.2-full-with-dependencies distribution
would still include a standalone aopalliance.jar, but the others wouldn't -
they would just include spring.jar, commons-logging.jar and cglib.jar (as
suggested earlier, with cglib clearly marked as optional).

Juergen



-----Original Message-----
From: spr...@li...
[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of
tho...@tr...
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 5:47 PM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Springframework-user] Velocity Layout Servlet (or
ToolView)


That's actually good for me - I'll have time to add the queryForRowset
features
later this week.

While we are dicussing the contets of the spring.jar -- could we include the
interfaces from aopalliance.jar in spring.jar and spring-aop.jar?  They are
after all public domain.  This would eliminate the need to include an
additional jar file when any of the AOP features are used behind the scenes.

Thomas


Quoting Juergen Hoeller <ju...@in...>:

> Darren,
>
> 1.2 RC1 was originally scheduled for mid this week, but it looks like it
> will now be deferred till Monday, to be able to get JDK 1.5 transaction
> annotations in. If you can get VelocityLayoutView ready till then, then
let
> it be part of 1.2 RC1 :-)
>
> Juergen
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: spr...@li...
> [mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of
> Darren Davison
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 12:44 PM
> To: spr...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Springframework-user] Velocity Layout Servlet (or
> ToolView)
>
>
>
> On Tue, March 15, 2005 11:11, Juergen Hoeller said:
> > Thanks for reminding me about this one, Maarten :-)
> >
> > Yes, please file an enhancement request on Jira for this. Else it might
> > remain unnoticed for an even longer time, which would be a pity. Thanks
in
> > advance!
> >
> > Maybe we can get this into Spring 1.2. If 1.2 RC1 is too close, we can
put
> > it into RC2 or 1.2 final. What do you think, Darren?
>
> Looks OK to me - I can probably do it over the next couple of days (when
is
> RC1 currently scheduled for?)
>
> D.
>
> --
> Darren Davison
> Public Key: #DD356B0D
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=ick
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-user mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-user
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-user mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-user
>





-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Springframework-user mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-user