Re: [Springframework-developer] Re: Hibernate 3 annotations in 1.2 rc1

[Colin S. <col...@ex...>]

Andreas Schildbach wrote:

>Colin Sampaleanu wrote:
>
>  
>
>>TxAttribute was intentional. The problem with TransactionAttribute is
>>that that is what EJB3 uses. If we use that, then it would preclude a
>>file having both our and their Annotations, or they would have to be
>>spelled out in fully qualified form (with package). I think that's not
>>acceptable.
>>    
>>
>
>Btw: Is it planned that Spring Transactions actually implement EJB3
>Transactions? (the same way Hibernate3 implements and extends EJB3 entities)
>
>Regards,
>  
>
I can't see that happening right now at least, as the EJB 3 code is not 
released. It might be a possibility later, as our transaction attributes 
are a superset of the EJB3 ones, which don't do a lot).

Colin