|
From: Andreas S. <an...@sc...> - 2005-03-13 16:48:28
|
Colin Sampaleanu wrote: > TxAttribute was intentional. The problem with TransactionAttribute is > that that is what EJB3 uses. If we use that, then it would preclude a > file having both our and their Annotations, or they would have to be > spelled out in fully qualified form (with package). I think that's not > acceptable. Btw: Is it planned that Spring Transactions actually implement EJB3 Transactions? (the same way Hibernate3 implements and extends EJB3 entities) Regards, Andreas |