RE: [Springframework-developer] Hibernate 3 annotations in 1.2 rc1

[Keith D. <ke...@in...>]

I like Transactional too - its obvious its metadata, describing something.

I don't like annotations like Inject or TransactionAttribute.  The former
doesn't really describe anything, it's a verb for petes sake, and the latter
seems redundant (we already know these things are attributes! ;-))

Keith

-----Original Message-----
From: spr...@li...
[mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf Of
Seth Ladd
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 5:11 PM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Hibernate 3 annotations in 1.2 rc1

On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 20:08:38 +0100, Erwin Vervaet
<erw...@er...> wrote:
> +1 for "Transactional"
> 
> Not sure if there is a naming convention for attributes? It seems to make
> sense that the name of the attribute expresses some 'property' of a class,
> method, ...: e.g. "this method is transactional", "this class is
> persistent", "this property is validated". If you follow that kind of
naming
> system Transactional actually makes more sense than TransactionAttribute.

+1 for Transactional

It reads better, like an adjective or adverb.

Seth

-- 
<a href="http://www.picklematrix.net/foaf.rdf">Seth Ladd's FOAF</a>
<a href="http://www.foaf-project.org/">What is FOAF?</a>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer