Re: [Springframework-developer] Hibernate 3 annotations in 1.2 rc1

[Seth L. <set...@gm...>]

On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 20:08:38 +0100, Erwin Vervaet
<erw...@er...> wrote:
> +1 for "Transactional"
> 
> Not sure if there is a naming convention for attributes? It seems to make
> sense that the name of the attribute expresses some 'property' of a class,
> method, ...: e.g. "this method is transactional", "this class is
> persistent", "this property is validated". If you follow that kind of naming
> system Transactional actually makes more sense than TransactionAttribute.

+1 for Transactional

It reads better, like an adjective or adverb.

Seth

-- 
<a href="http://www.picklematrix.net/foaf.rdf">Seth Ladd's FOAF</a>
<a href="http://www.foaf-project.org/">What is FOAF?</a>