Re: [Springframework-developer] Re: ParameterNameMethodNameResolver

[Colin S. <col...@ex...>]

Matt Raible wrote:

>
> On Mar 10, 2005, at 3:04 PM, kat...@ho... wrote:
>
>> While on the topic, we should look at renaming the default parameter 
>> to something other than 'action'. This clashes with the form's 
>> 'action' in Javascript, and so is maybe not a good default. This 
>> would probably be OK as part of a 1.2 release.
>
>
> +1, I'd recommend "method" or something.  I've seen the same issue re: 
> JavaScript, forms and button names.

Hmm,

I kind of like the idea, but this would probably break exsiting apps 
that relied on the "action" default. They would not require a recompile, 
a config change to set the property back to "action" would do, but I'm a 
bit loath to break backwards compatibility in a .X release for something 
that's not a true bug. Even now people can alway rename the param name.

Anybody else have an opinion on this?

Colin