|
From: Dmitriy K. <dko...@ru...> - 2005-03-10 20:48:28
|
+1. I see it as a useful feature (to be able to identify TXs by name) for Weblogic users. Dmitriy. Juergen Hoeller wrote: >There's an interesting suggestion (by Bart Strubbe) regarding WebLogic's >transaction monitor: > >http://forum.springframework.org/viewtopic.php?t=3981 > >Essentially, WebLogic's transaction monitor seems to use "transaction names" >for monitoring and logging purposes. WebLogic's EJB container automatically >leverages this facility. The API to set such a transaction name is >WebLogic-specific; we could add support for it to our >WebLogicJtaTransactionManager. > >The main problem is where to get the transaction name from. I'm inclined to >extend our TransactionDefinition with a "getName" or "getDescription" >method, allowing to pass such a name in. TransactionInterceptor could >automatically specify class name plus method name there. > >Thoughts? > >Juergen > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. >Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >_______________________________________________ >Springframework-developer mailing list >Spr...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > |